A High Court challenge over changes made to disability support cost Norfolk County Council more than £120,000 - it can be revealed.
The decision, which was made more than two years ago as a cost-cutting measure, meant more than 4,000 disabled people were left having to pay more for their adult social care.
It was widely criticised at the time and led to the mother of a young woman with Down syndrome launching a judicial review against it.
And after a judge ruled in favour of the mother, who can not be named for legal reasons, the council agreed to reimburse those who had overpaid - at a cost of around £1m.
And now, the legal costs of the battle can be revealed, after a settlement was agreed earlier this week.
A spokesman for Norfolk County Council said: "The legal costs arising from the judicial review - including the claimant’s costs, which have just been settled this week, and which made up the bulk of the total - were £124,328.
"The money will come from reserves set aside for legal costs, not from service budgets.
“Cabinet agreed on January 12 to respond, in full, to the judgement – not progressing further care charge changes and engaging with the people affected and their families on a longer-term approach.”
The judicial review came as a result of a decision in February 2019, which the Conservative-controlled council said at the time the move would save £4m and bring the council into line with other local authorities.
But a High Court judge ruled in December last year that in doing so, it had acted unlawfully and had discriminated against the vulnerable recipients of the support - albeit in an unforeseen and unintentional way.
The ordeal also led to calls for Bill Borrett, cabinet member for adult social services, to resign.
Steve Morphew, leader of the Labour group at County Hall, said: "Defending what was always indefensible is an unacceptable waste of money. Councillor Borrett seems impervious to the courts ruling his policy breached the human rights of some of the most vulnerable people in Norfolk.
"Now add a completely avoidable £125k bill to hard-pressed Norfolk council taxpayers and you can add incompetence to the cruelty and callousness of this saga."
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here