Exploring shared services
COUNCIL chiefs have been urged to safeguard frontline services and avoid compulsory job cuts as two Norfolk authorities work towards sharing staff.
COUNCIL chiefs have been urged to safeguard frontline services and avoid compulsory job cuts as two Norfolk authorities work towards sharing staff.
Breckland and South Norfolk councils have each agreed to invest �45,000 of officer time to explore a shared services agreement.
It is aimed at cutting duplication and saving money but both councils would keep their current councillors.
The Regional Improvement and Efficiency Partnership has given a �90,000 grant for consultants to work on a feasibility study and business plan.
You may also want to watch:
The aim is for an agreement to be signed by the two councils in May.
Breckland leader William Nunn said: “We must be able to make efficiency savings. We are doing the feasibility work and see where it takes us. We would have opportunities which are not there at the moment as a small authority. We will be a considerable sized organisation covering 250,000 people if it goes ahead.”
Most Read
- 1 Have your say over future of growing estate
- 2 Eagle-eyed plane spotter saves pilot's life
- 3 'It's killing me': Abuse victim moved into flat with asbestos and mould
- 4 Car crashes into central reservation on A11
- 5 Poultry company owner says food industry is at 'crisis point'
- 6 Where you are most likely to get your bike stolen in Norfolk
- 7 'Like an invasion' - locals speak out over five-day festival
- 8 Abusive man grabbed wife by throat and banged her head on floor
- 9 Parkruns return to Norfolk for first time since Covid
- 10 Pet crematorium plans submitted but residents have air concerns
Chief executive Trevor Holden said no estimates had been made about how many posts may be lost.
Breckland Labour group members Robin Goreham, Pat Balaam and Michael Fanthorpe issued a statement saying they “cautiously welcomed” the move and added: “Innovation is far more inspirational and worthwhile than opposing change at all costs.”
But they called for regular scrutiny of the process, a �135,000 cap on spending on the investigation, assurances on frontline services “being maintained and upheld to the highest standards at all times” and full consultation with staff and avoiding compulsory redundancies.
Breckland councillor Ian Sherwood said: “What is important is the big difference between what we are proposing and a unitary council is democratic representation. That is what would be lost under unitary. Breckland is represented by local people in a fair number and unitary would be much fewer councillors representing more people.”
